Accounting for Baseline Observations in Randomized Clinical Trials
نویسنده
چکیده
In clinical trials investigating the treatment of chronic, progressive diseases, a common design is to make some physiologic measurement of the disease state at the start of the trial, randomize patients to either the experimental treatment or some control treatment (placebo), follow the patients over some period of time, and then measure once again the physiologic measurement of the disease state. The question then arises: How should the baseline measurements made prior to randomization be used? In this manuscript, I consider several common strategies that might be used in this setting, including analyzing only the follow-up measurement, analyzing the change in measurements, and the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) approach of adjusting for the baseline measurement in a linear regression model. I illustrate several different ways to motivate the use of ANCOVA, as well as examining the settings in which not measuring baseline might be preferred. I conclude with a discussion of how these results might change when using a randomized crossover design.
منابع مشابه
Omega-3 fatty acids as monotherapy in treating depression in pregnant women: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Background Previous studies have reported inconsistent findings regarding the efficacy of omega-3 fatty acids on pregnant women with major depressive disorder (MDD). This meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the clinical applicability of omega-3 fatty acids in treating depression in pregnant women. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared omega-3 fatty acids ...
متن کاملI-22: Decision Trees for Identifying Predictor of Treatment Effectiveness in Clinical Trials and Its Application to Ovulation in a Study of Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Background: Double-blind, randomized clinical trials are the preferred approach to demonstrate the effectiveness of one treatment against another. The comparison is, however, made on the average group effects. While patients and clinicians have always struggled to understand why patients respond differently to the same treatment, and while much hope has been held out for the nascent field of pr...
متن کاملOmega-3 fatty acids as monotherapy in treating depression in pregnant women: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Background Previous studies have reported inconsistent findings regarding the efficacy of omega-3 fatty acids on pregnant women with major depressive disorder (MDD). This meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the clinical applicability of omega-3 fatty acids in treating depression in pregnant women. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared omega-3 fatty acids ...
متن کاملدرماتولوژی مبتنی بر شواهد: گزارش درست مقایسهی پیامدها در کارآزماییهای بالینی
According to evidence-based medicine, randomized controlled clinical trials are a group of research designs which provides the highest level of clinical evidence, particularly regarding therapeutic or preventive interventions. Considering the dramatic increase in the number of published clinical trials in medical journals, the readership need to have knowledge about the problems that may occur ...
متن کاملAtorvastatin for Prevention of Amikacin-induced Electrolytes Imbalances; a Randomized Clinical Trial
Aminoglycosides are still widely used for treatment of gram-negative sepsis in critically ill patients. The most reported electrolyte abnormalities related to these drugs are hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, and hypocalcemia. In this study potential benefit of atorvastatin in prevention of amikacin-induced electrolytes imbalances has been evaluated. In this trial 44 patients were assigned to the at...
متن کامل